🐛 Fix SequenceSet#max(n) when cardinality < n <= size (backport to 0.5)
#586
+16
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This backports #580 to
v0.5-stable.When
SequenceSet#max(n)is called withn > cardinality, it should return a duplicate of the whole set. But,#max(n)is implemented using#slice(-n..), and (copying the behavior ofArray), when a slicing starts from an out-of-range index, it returnsnil.It was using
-[count, size].minto keep the index from going out-of-range. Prior to 0.6.0,#sizeis the same as#count, so it gives incorrect results when the set contains an endless range.SequenceSet#cardinalityhas not been backported to 0.5, so this makes that calculation inline.This change should also give a small performance boost, because it bypasses the complexity of
#slice(range)and just calls#dup(or returnsselfwhen the set is frozen).