Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gantoine, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue where screenshots were not being correctly associated with Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request fixes an issue with how screenshots are associated with saves and states by making the matching logic more specific and scoping it by user. The changes are logical and are supported by new tests. I've added a few suggestions to improve the readability of the new logic and to refactor the new tests for better maintainability by reducing code duplication.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the screenshot lookup logic to improve matching for saves and states, and also scopes the lookup by user. The changes are well-tested. A critical bug was identified in screenshots_handler.py regarding incorrect exclusion logic for filenames, which is detailed in the specific code review comment.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request does a great job of fixing the screenshot matching logic for saves and states by making the queries more specific and user-scoped. The refactoring in screenshots_handler.py and the addition of comprehensive tests are excellent improvements. However, I've found a critical logic error in the filter method's handling of exclude_filenames, which uses or_ where it should be using and_. This will cause mark_missing_screenshots to incorrectly identify screenshots as missing. Please see my detailed comment.
Description
Explain the changes or enhancements you are proposing with this pull request.
Fixes an issue where screenshots aren't correctly associated with saves/states, especially when uploading via the API.
Fixes #3031
Checklist
Please check all that apply.
Screenshots (if applicable)