Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gantoine, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This hotfix refines the scanning process by introducing a conditional check for Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a small but effective optimization. By checking if gamelist is a selected metadata source before populating the cache, it avoids unnecessary processing during scans. The change is well-implemented and correctly uses the MetadataSource enum. This is a good hotfix that improves efficiency.
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
Description
Explain the changes or enhancements you are proposing with this pull request.
No point in populating the cache if gamelist handler isn't being used during the scan...
Checklist
Please check all that apply.