Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gantoine, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request optimizes the display of game covers in list views by introducing support for the WebP image format. By conditionally serving WebP images, the system can achieve faster loading times and more efficient resource usage. Additionally, the changes refine how cover art is displayed, incorporating animation logic and improving the visual feedback during image loading. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the RAvatar component to use .webp images for game covers when available, which is a great optimization. My review focuses on some regressions introduced in the template part of the component. I've identified missing accessibility attributes and error handling for image loading, and a missing template ref. I've provided a single comment with a code suggestion that addresses all these points to improve the component's robustness and accessibility.
|
What if the scheduled task is not enabled but ran at least once manually? |
IMHO - that might be a different issue entirely because I noticed I had to enable the task - without enabling it, I couldn't run it manually nor would it run scheduled. I'd argue managing this via a switch is |
Description
Explain the changes or enhancements you are proposing with this pull request.
Fixes #2844
Checklist
Please check all that apply.