docs: change dep.js to polyfill.js in faqs (#4521)

zjffun · web-flow · commit 35e7657d2d99 · 2022-06-05T04:09:09.000Z
diff --git a/docs/06-faqs.md b/docs/06-faqs.md
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ console.log('polyfill');
 console.log('main');
 ```
 
-with the execution order `external` → `polyfill.js` → `main.js`. This is not a problem caused by Rollup putting the `import` at the top of the bundle—imports are always executed first, no matter where they are located in the file. This problem can be solved by creating more chunks: If `dep.js` ends up in a different chunk than `main.js`, [correct execution order will be preserved](https://rollupjs.org/repl/?shareable=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). However there is not yet an automatic way to do this in Rollup. For code-splitting, the situation is similar as Rollup is trying to create as few chunks as possible while making sure no code is executed that is not needed.
+with the execution order `external` → `polyfill.js` → `main.js`. This is not a problem caused by Rollup putting the `import` at the top of the bundle—imports are always executed first, no matter where they are located in the file. This problem can be solved by creating more chunks: If `polyfill.js` ends up in a different chunk than `main.js`, [correct execution order will be preserved](https://rollupjs.org/repl/?shareable=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). However there is not yet an automatic way to do this in Rollup. For code-splitting, the situation is similar as Rollup is trying to create as few chunks as possible while making sure no code is executed that is not needed.
 
 For most code this is not a problem, because Rollup can guarantee:
 
