Skip to content

fix(use_strict): shouldn't care about empty modules#2844

Merged
hyfdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

fix(use_strict): shouldn't care about empty modules#2844
hyfdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules

Conversation

@hyfdev

@hyfdev hyfdev commented Nov 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

hyfdev commented Nov 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@hyfdev
hyfdev marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 11:02
@hyfdev
hyfdev force-pushed the 11-21-fix_use_strict_should_nt_care_about_treeshaked_modules branch from 8b7cdc3 to 13f28de Compare November 21, 2024 11:16
@hyfdev
hyfdev force-pushed the 11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules branch from 38ecbc0 to 3f32c38 Compare November 21, 2024 11:16
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmarks Rust

  • target: main(caa5e87)
  • pr: 11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules(ae72801)
group                                                               pr                                     target
-----                                                               --                                     ------
bundle/bundle@multi-duplicated-top-level-symbol                     1.00     59.3±0.84ms        ? ?/sec    1.02     60.5±1.33ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@multi-duplicated-top-level-symbol-minify              1.00     85.2±1.19ms        ? ?/sec    1.02     87.0±1.07ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@multi-duplicated-top-level-symbol-minify-sourcemap    1.00    100.9±1.04ms        ? ?/sec    1.02    102.5±0.92ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@multi-duplicated-top-level-symbol-sourcemap           1.00     68.2±0.66ms        ? ?/sec    1.02     69.6±0.73ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@rome-ts                                               1.00    107.8±0.76ms        ? ?/sec    1.01    108.7±0.99ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@rome-ts-minify                                        1.00    203.0±1.72ms        ? ?/sec    1.04    210.8±1.67ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@rome-ts-minify-sourcemap                              1.00    247.9±1.95ms        ? ?/sec    1.02    252.7±8.58ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@rome-ts-sourcemap                                     1.00    123.4±1.10ms        ? ?/sec    1.00    123.6±1.06ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs                                               1.00     35.0±0.46ms        ? ?/sec    1.01     35.4±1.50ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs-minify                                        1.00     92.4±1.96ms        ? ?/sec    1.00     92.7±1.16ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs-minify-sourcemap                              1.00    108.2±0.74ms        ? ?/sec    1.00    108.5±0.82ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs-sourcemap                                     1.00     44.3±0.39ms        ? ?/sec    1.00     44.2±0.28ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs10x                                            1.00    385.8±5.17ms        ? ?/sec    1.01    388.6±5.34ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs10x-minify                                     1.00   1211.2±8.43ms        ? ?/sec    1.01   1217.3±8.96ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs10x-minify-sourcemap                           1.00  1421.3±11.85ms        ? ?/sec    1.00   1426.0±8.72ms        ? ?/sec
bundle/bundle@threejs10x-sourcemap                                  1.00    450.2±6.91ms        ? ?/sec    1.00    450.2±6.63ms        ? ?/sec
remapping/remapping                                                 1.00     27.3±0.14ms        ? ?/sec    1.03     28.1±0.11ms        ? ?/sec
remapping/render-chunk-remapping                                    1.00     75.0±0.47ms        ? ?/sec    1.00     75.3±0.66ms        ? ?/sec
scan/scan@rome-ts                                                   1.00     86.9±0.79ms        ? ?/sec    1.00     87.3±0.77ms        ? ?/sec
scan/scan@threejs                                                   1.00     26.9±0.11ms        ? ?/sec    1.01     27.2±0.85ms        ? ?/sec
scan/scan@threejs10x                                                1.00    280.2±3.84ms        ? ?/sec    1.01    281.9±2.87ms        ? ?/sec

Base automatically changed from 11-21-fix_use_strict_should_nt_care_about_treeshaked_modules to main November 21, 2024 11:50
@hyfdev
hyfdev force-pushed the 11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules branch from 3f32c38 to 304e7c2 Compare November 21, 2024 11:51
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for rolldown-rs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ae72801
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/rolldown-rs/deploys/673f2457676ba3000822e049

hyfdev commented Nov 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge activity

  • Nov 21, 6:51 AM EST: Graphite rebased this pull request after merging its parent, because this pull request is set to merge when ready.

@hyfdev
hyfdev force-pushed the 11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules branch from 304e7c2 to ae72801 Compare November 21, 2024 12:15
@hyfdev
hyfdev added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit ea3f093 Nov 21, 2024
@hyfdev
hyfdev deleted the 11-21-fix_use_strict_shouldn_t_care_about_empty_modules branch November 21, 2024 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: remove "use strict" for an empty file

2 participants