Added ArrayDefaultTypeReferenceType for when array symbol is not defined yet#1111
Merged
Merged
Conversation
TwitchBronBron
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
TwitchBronBron
left a comment
TwitchBronBron
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested and this works great. Thanks!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Needed to add a whole new ReferenceType for this use case!
Because the for-each-loop target was defined on a namespace, it wasn't defined yet at File-validation time (Namespaces are only defined at scope linking), so the default type was unknown.
Now that we have a reference type for this particular case, the array symbol can be defined in the future, and the for-each item will be automatically known.