feat: support for strict enum mapping#356
Conversation
I updated |
latonz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the updates 😊 😊
I added my feedback and also added a separate comment what I had in mind regarding 04-enum.mdx.
latonz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the updates.
There are still a few linter issues...
|
How do I fix the conventional commits check? |
Codecov Report
📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #356 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.73% 91.84% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 126 130 +4
Lines 3931 4110 +179
Branches 548 567 +19
==========================================
+ Hits 3606 3775 +169
- Misses 214 221 +7
- Partials 111 114 +3
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
@jvzijp no need to make this check green since it is not a required one. It's just a reminder to adjust the squashed commit message when merging the PR as needed. |
|
Ah I see. Great :) My pleasure, it was a great learning experience. |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Closes #325