Skip to content

Time zone coverage: two parallel meetings vs. rotating schedule #2

@rfluethi

Description

@rfluethi

Topic

Should we run two parallel Office Hours meetings per month to cover all time zones, rather than rotating a single meeting time?

Why this topic?

@rjekic raised this in the blog comments:

"I want to propose two meetings that cover all time zones, instead of rotating meetings. I hope we can make some sort of arrangement for this; it does not have to be the same day."

The current pilot runs one meeting at 14:00 UTC (friendly for Europe/Asia). A second slot (e.g. 00:00 UTC) could cover APAC and the Americas more effectively.

Suggested discussion questions

  • How many people do we realistically have to moderate two tracks?
  • Would a second meeting need its own separate agenda or mirror the first?
  • What time slots would best serve APAC and Americas contributors?
  • At what attendance level does a second meeting make sense?

Proposed by

@rjekic (via blog comment, March 2, 2026)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    timezone-APACRelevant for an APAC-friendly meeting timetimezone-AmericasRelevant for an Americas-friendly meeting timetopic-proposalSuggested topic for a future Office Hours meeting

    Projects

    Status
    Todo

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions