Skip to content

Conversation

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

@srh srh commented Nov 20, 2019

Thanks to a report and some information from Hiroyuki Fujiwara

I'll note that the db("name").ne(system_db) part of the query is unnecessary.

@srh srh added this to the 2.4 milestone Nov 20, 2019
Thanks to a report and some information and testing from
Hiroyuki Fujiwara

Regenerates web_assets.cc.
@srh srh force-pushed the srh/admin_many_dbs branch from 42820d2 to 905ada5 Compare November 20, 2019 02:59
@srh srh merged commit 905ada5 into rethinkdb:v2.4.x Nov 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants