You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Proposal: add a WFGY 16-problem RAG failure checklist for Redis Stack / RedisVL based RAG #520
Redis Stack and RedisVL are frequently used as the vector and cache layer for RAG applications. When answers are wrong or unstable, users often do not know whether the problem is data, configuration, or higher level pipeline design.
I maintain WFGY RAG 16 Problem Map, an open-source failure map for RAG and LLM pipelines.
A triage prompt that uses a failing run to classify the failure and propose structural fixes
The same map is already integrated or cited in:
RAGFlow and LlamaIndex RAG troubleshooting docs
ToolUniverse (Harvard MIMS Lab) as a triage tool
Rankify (University of Innsbruck)
Multimodal RAG Survey (QCRI LLM Lab)
Curated lists such as Awesome LLM Apps and Awesome Data Science – academic
Proposal:
Add a short RAG failure checklist for Redis Stack / RedisVL based RAG. For example:
A docs page that:
Explains typical failure scenarios when Redis is used for vector search and caching.
Maps these scenarios to WFGY’s 16 failure types.
Links to the Global Debug Card so users can run the triage prompt on their own failing runs.
An example where:
A Redis based RAG pipeline is built and intentionally misconfigured.
Failing calls are captured with queries, retrieved vectors, and logs.
The WFGY triage prompt is used to label each failure and guide fixes.
This would give Redis users a structured diagnostic tool that is compatible with many different RAG frameworks while keeping Redis itself focused on performance and reliability.
If you like this idea I can help draft the guide or example in your preferred format.
Triaged as a documentation/enhancement request rather than a core library bug. A focused docs page or example PR would be the most direct way to move this forward.
Activity
abrookins commentedon Mar 12, 2026
Triaged as a documentation/enhancement request rather than a core library bug. A focused docs page or example PR would be the most direct way to move this forward.
onestardao commentedon Mar 12, 2026
Ok no problem , I will open a PR today, thanks