Remove assert and refuse delete expired on ro replicas#10248
Merged
oranagra merged 1 commit intoredis:unstablefrom Feb 8, 2022
Merged
Remove assert and refuse delete expired on ro replicas#10248oranagra merged 1 commit intoredis:unstablefrom
oranagra merged 1 commit intoredis:unstablefrom
Conversation
zuiderkwast
commented
Feb 7, 2022
oranagra
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
oranagra
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2022
…10573) RM_Yield was missing a call to protectClient to prevent redis from processing future commands of the yielding client. Adding tests that fail without this fix. This would be complicated to solve since nested calls to RM_Call used to replace the current_client variable with the module temp client. It looks like it's no longer necessary to do that, since it was added back in #9890 to solve two issues, both already gone: 1. call to CONFIG SET maxmemory could trigger a module hook calling RM_Call. although this specific issue is gone, arguably other hooks like keyspace notification, can do the same. 2. an assertion in lookupKey that checks the current command of the current client, introduced in #9572 and removed in #10248
enjoy-binbin
pushed a commit
to enjoy-binbin/redis
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
…edis#10573) RM_Yield was missing a call to protectClient to prevent redis from processing future commands of the yielding client. Adding tests that fail without this fix. This would be complicated to solve since nested calls to RM_Call used to replace the current_client variable with the module temp client. It looks like it's no longer necessary to do that, since it was added back in redis#9890 to solve two issues, both already gone: 1. call to CONFIG SET maxmemory could trigger a module hook calling RM_Call. although this specific issue is gone, arguably other hooks like keyspace notification, can do the same. 2. an assertion in lookupKey that checks the current command of the current client, introduced in redis#9572 and removed in redis#10248
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's an assertion added recently to make sure that non-write commands don't use lookupKeyWrite,
It was initially meant to be used only on read-only replicas, but we thought it'll not have enough coverage,
so used it on the masters too.
We now realize that in some cases this can cause issues for modules, so we remove the assert.
Other than that, we also make sure not to force expireIfNeeded on read-only replicas.
even if they somehow run a write command.
See #9572 (comment)