Skip to content

3.5.1#6690

Merged
ckifer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
3.5.1
Nov 28, 2025
Merged

3.5.1#6690
ckifer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
3.5.1

Conversation

@ckifer

@ckifer ckifer commented Nov 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bump 3.5.1

might fix one other thing before merging this...

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Version bumped to 3.5.1

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

The pull request bumps the project version from 3.5.0 to 3.5.1 in the top-level package.json file. This is a patch version update with no changes to source code, dependencies, or logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Version Bump
package.json
Updated version field from "3.5.0" to "3.5.1"

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Possibly related PRs

  • 3.4.0 #6596: Modifies the same package.json "version" field for a previous version bump
  • 3.5 #6671: Updates the top-level package.json version field to 3.5.0, which this PR further bumps to 3.5.1

Suggested reviewers

  • PavelVanecek

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is minimal and vague, missing most required template sections including Related Issue, Motivation and Context, testing details, and change type classification. Complete the PR description following the template: add related issue link, explain motivation/context for the version bump, describe testing performed, and specify the change type (likely a release/version bump).
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "3.5.1" is a version number that matches the package.json update, making it partially related to the main change but overly generic and lacks descriptive context. Consider using a more descriptive title like "Bump version to 3.5.1" to clearly communicate the change purpose and avoid confusion with other version references.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 3.5.1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 599a9b7 and b1f354f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-19T14:08:01.728Z
Learnt from: PavelVanecek
Repo: recharts/recharts PR: 6659
File: www/src/components/GuideView/Performance/index.tsx:232-250
Timestamp: 2025-11-19T14:08:01.728Z
Learning: In Recharts version 3.4.2, object-as-prop optimizations were introduced to reduce unnecessary re-renders when new object references are passed as props. This affects the recommendation for the `react-perf/jsx-no-new-object-as-prop` ESLint rule.

Applied to files:

  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build, Test, Pack
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump is correct; verify related artifacts are updated.

The patch version bump from 3.5.0 to 3.5.1 is appropriate for semantic versioning. However, note that the PR description states "might fix one other thing before merging," suggesting this may not yet be complete.

Ensure the following are also updated:

  • Lock files (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, or equivalent) should reflect the new version
  • Any changelog or release notes documentation
  • Verify the PR is truly ready for merge (description implies potential incompleteness)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.02%. Comparing base (599a9b7) to head (b1f354f).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6690   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.02%   94.02%           
=======================================
  Files         499      499           
  Lines       42547    42547           
  Branches     4873     4873           
=======================================
  Hits        40004    40004           
  Misses       2538     2538           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ckifer
ckifer merged commit 9726f20 into main Nov 28, 2025
26 of 28 checks passed
@ckifer
ckifer deleted the 3.5.1 branch November 28, 2025 06:25
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants