-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
Improve debian packaging #962
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@carragom Regarding usr/share/rear/conf/default.conf @gdha |
|
... and preferably I would like to be informed in the |
|
I have added the required comment, check it out and let know if it's good. Cheers. |
|
I tested it on my SLES12-SP2-beta5 test system. ++ pushd /tmp/rear.aX4QCYG3LkqNb98/tmp/isofs +++ basename /usr/bin/xorrisofs ++ test ebiso = xorrisofs ++ /usr/bin/xorrisofs -v -o /root/rear/var/lib/rear/output/rear-g62.iso -b isolinux/isolinux.bin -c isolinux/boot.cat -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -R -J -volid RELAXRECOVER -v -iso-level 3 . xorriso 1.3.4 : RockRidge filesystem manipulator, libburnia project. Drive current: -outdev 'stdio:/root/rear/var/lib/rear/output/rear-g62.iso' Media current: stdio file, overwriteable Media status : is blank Media summary: 0 sessions, 0 data blocks, 0 data, 13.1g free Added to ISO image: directory '/'='/tmp/rear.aX4QCYG3LkqNb98/tmp/isofs' xorriso : UPDATE : 14 files added in 1 seconds xorriso : UPDATE : 14 files added in 1 seconds xorriso : UPDATE : 10.68% done xorriso : UPDATE : 10.68% done xorriso : UPDATE : 64.07% done ISO image produced: 76719 sectors Written to medium : 76719 sectors at LBA 0 Writing to 'stdio:/root/rear/var/lib/rear/output/rear-g62.iso' completed successfully. ++ StopIfError 'Could not create ISO image (with /usr/bin/xorrisofs)' ++ (( 0 != 0 )) ++ popd If the new default does not work on whatever Linux distribution(s) The only possible drawback with the new default On my SLES12-SP2-beta5 test system I get I.e. about 50% bigger ISO image size with xorrisofs. Not that 50 M would matter much for one But also when ISO image size matters there is the same Bottom line from my current point of view: @gdha |
|
@aussendorf |
|
Would love to but I switched my server to BIOS, sorry. |
@jsmeix
This should solve #828 and #696. In this pull priority is given to the
xorrisofsbinary over the other binaries (mkisofsandgenisoimage).Let me know what you guys think.
Cheers.