Skip to content

Conversation

@jsmeix
Copy link
Member

@jsmeix jsmeix commented May 20, 2016

added check for vaild BACKUP_URL schemes
see #842
currently 'nfs' 'cifs' 'usb' 'tape' 'file' 'sshfs' are valid
according to the comment in 05_check_NETFS_requirements.sh

see #842
currently 'nfs' 'cifs' 'usb' 'tape' 'file' 'sshfs' are valid
according to the comment in 05_check_NETFS_requirements.sh
@jsmeix jsmeix added enhancement Adaptions and new features bug The code does not do what it is meant to do waiting for info Also used to mark an issue as stale, cf. stale.yml labels May 20, 2016
@jsmeix jsmeix added this to the Rear v1.19 milestone May 20, 2016
@jsmeix
Copy link
Member Author

jsmeix commented May 20, 2016

@gdha
I assigned this to you because I would like that you
check if my list of valid BACKUP_URL schemes
is complete to avoid possible regressions
if I missed a valid BACKUP_URL scheme.

@gdha gdha merged commit fe8fa14 into rear:master May 23, 2016
@jsmeix jsmeix deleted the add_check_for_vaild_BACKUP_URL_schemes branch May 23, 2016 13:43
@jsmeix
Copy link
Member Author

jsmeix commented May 23, 2016

@gdha
many thanks for checking it!

@jsmeix jsmeix removed the waiting for info Also used to mark an issue as stale, cf. stale.yml label May 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug The code does not do what it is meant to do enhancement Adaptions and new features fixed / solved / done

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants