feat(Col): update classes based on alpha.6 changes#267
Merged
eddywashere merged 1 commit intov4from Jan 5, 2017
Merged
Conversation
BREAKING CHANGE: The default xs prop now returns `.col` instead of `.col-xs-12`. The `auto` size value now returns `.col-auto` or `.col-sm-auto` for variable width content columns. Use `true` or `''` as the size value to return `.col` or `.col-sm` for auto layout of columns (not to be confused with `auto` -> (variable width of content)).
This was referenced Jan 5, 2017
Closed
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BREAKING CHANGE: The default xs prop now returns
.colinstead of.col-xs-12. Theautosize value now returns.col-autoor.col-sm-autofor variable width content columns. Usetrueor''as the size value to return
.color.col-smfor auto layout ofcolumns (not to be confused with
auto-> (variable width ofcontent)).
Holding off on the flex utility props. I'm starting to think that would be too much and people should apply flex utility classes via className.