Skip to content

Conversation

@violetagg
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@violetagg violetagg added the type/enhancement A general enhancement label Mar 19, 2025
@violetagg violetagg added this to the 1.2.5 milestone Mar 19, 2025
Copy link
Member

@chemicL chemicL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just left two questions.

Signed-off-by: Violeta Georgieva <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Possibly the BiFunction could be a an interface, which can document expectations of implementations and also makes it discoverable.

Signed-off-by: Violeta Georgieva <[email protected]>
@violetagg
Copy link
Member Author

@chemicL @rstoyanchev I extracted the BiFunction as an interface. PTAL

Signed-off-by: Violeta Georgieva <[email protected]>
@violetagg
Copy link
Member Author

Let me merge this one. We can follow up if needed.

@violetagg violetagg merged commit 73c01e6 into 1.2.x Mar 27, 2025
14 checks passed
@violetagg violetagg deleted the resolved-addr-selector branch March 27, 2025 09:18
violetagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: Violeta Georgieva <[email protected]>
violetagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: Violeta Georgieva <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type/enhancement A general enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants