Change nearest neighbor warp expectations at GDAL 3.10.2#3330
Merged
Conversation
Plus reformatting of the test module.
sgillies
commented
Apr 14, 2025
| True, | ||
| 1309625, | ||
| marks=pytest.mark.skipif( | ||
| gdal_version_info >= (3, 10, 2), reason="See GDAL gh-11713" |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here's the kernel of this PR. See OSGeo/gdal#11711 and OSGeo/gdal#11713.
sgillies
changed the title
QuLogic
pushed a commit
to QuLogic/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
* Change expectations at GDAL 3.10.2 Plus reformatting of the test module. * Watch out for GDAL dev versions
QuLogic
added a commit
to QuLogic/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
These were set to differ with GDAL 3.10.2 in rasterio#3330, but it appears the change only actually came in with GDAL 3.11.
Contributor
|
From running tests against all 3.10.x versions, it appears that the relevant change was never put in a release: https://github.com/rasterio/rasterio/actions/runs/17524587082?pr=3394 It's only a problem with 3.11, so I've modified these tests to check 3.11 instead in #3394. |
QuLogic
added a commit
to QuLogic/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
These were set to differ with GDAL 3.10.2 in rasterio#3330, but it appears the change only actually came in with GDAL 3.11.
QuLogic
added a commit
to QuLogic/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
These were set to differ with GDAL 3.10.2 in rasterio#3330, but it appears the change only actually came in with GDAL 3.11.
QuLogic
added a commit
to QuLogic/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2025
These were set to differ with GDAL 3.10.2 in rasterio#3330, but it appears the change only actually came in with GDAL 3.11.
snowman2
pushed a commit
to snowman2/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2025
These were set to differ with GDAL 3.10.2 in rasterio#3330, but it appears the change only actually came in with GDAL 3.11.
This was referenced Sep 11, 2025
snowman2
pushed a commit
to snowman2/rasterio
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
* Change expectations at GDAL 3.10.2 Plus reformatting of the test module. * Watch out for GDAL dev versions
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Plus reformatting of the test module. See OSGeo/gdal#11711. Resolves #3301.