Can we get a merge please? 🙏 Ty 🙂

+1
Right now it is not possible to use this alongside https://github.com/ramsey/identifier due to this dependency constraint.
I understand that identifier would be a replacement, but in my case for example I just need to work with snowflakes without touching the rest of the system which uses uuid.

I quote @ekvedaras

Can we get a merge please? 🙏 Ty 🙂

@ramsey Do you have some time to have a look a rerun ci and maybe make a new version if this PR is fine?

I don't know how to force the CI to re-run. The GitHub UI is no longer giving me the button to approve the CI workflow, which is very odd.

It also seems there's another problem with allowing brick/math 0.12 and 0.13, as detailed in #586 and #588, and these changes require a BC break in ramsey/uuid.

I'm not sure how to proceed. It appears that, in order to upgrade to brick/math 0.12 and 0.13, I'll need to introduce a BC break to ramsey/uuid.

I understand that identifier would be a replacement, but in my case for example I just need to work with snowflakes without touching the rest of the system which uses uuid.

@kontoulis, you're aware that ramsey/identifier doesn't have any tagged releases yet, right? 😉

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.16%. Comparing base (c72360e) to head (bbad2a2).
⚠️ Report is 45 commits behind head on 4.x.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                4.x     #589   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     95.16%   95.16%           
  Complexity      584      584           
=========================================
  Files            70       70           
  Lines          1840     1840           
=========================================
  Hits           1751     1751           
  Misses           89       89           

@ramsey ofc, but I am looking forward to use that when released instead of alternatives 🙂

I am looking forward to use that when released instead of alternatives 🙂

I need to get back to developing it. Being laid off, searching for a job, and then starting a new job really put a damper on my open source work, but I'm slowly getting back into it.

After further inspection, it looks like my use of a custom RoundingMode that performs a translation with brick/math's RoundingMode was actually very beneficial.

See my comment here: #588 (comment)