Skip to content

Conversation

@moliholy
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR skips docker build if it already exists in the repository.

@moliholy moliholy requested a review from AlexD10S September 23, 2025 14:05
@moliholy moliholy self-assigned this Sep 23, 2025
@moliholy moliholy force-pushed the fix/skip-docker-image-build branch from b177d5f to 4238fc0 Compare September 23, 2025 14:09
@moliholy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AlexD10S I confirm this works. The docker image building is skipped, as it already exists.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexD10S AlexD10S left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for the links shared!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.16%. Comparing base (8dd893c) to head (dda0f62).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #638   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.16%   78.16%           
=======================================
  Files         109      109           
  Lines       25464    25464           
  Branches    25464    25464           
=======================================
  Hits        19903    19903           
  Misses       3481     3481           
  Partials     2080     2080           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@moliholy moliholy requested a review from AlexD10S September 25, 2025 13:05
@moliholy moliholy merged commit 69cfcce into main Sep 25, 2025
24 checks passed
@moliholy moliholy deleted the fix/skip-docker-image-build branch September 25, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants