Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexD10S
Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexD10S AlexD10S commented Sep 5, 2025

This PR improves the handling of user-provided arguments for contract calls:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.10526% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.08%. Comparing base (0621dbe) to head (ac69d90).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/pop-cli/src/commands/call/contract.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
crates/pop-cli/src/commands/up/contract.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
crates/pop-cli/src/common/contracts.rs 97.22% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #618      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.04%   77.08%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         109      109              
  Lines       24873    25002     +129     
  Branches    24873    25002     +129     
==========================================
+ Hits        19164    19273     +109     
- Misses       3705     3712       +7     
- Partials     2004     2017      +13     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
crates/pop-cli/src/commands/call/contract.rs 67.83% <0.00%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
crates/pop-cli/src/commands/up/contract.rs 14.33% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
crates/pop-cli/src/common/contracts.rs 84.37% <97.22%> (+3.72%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@AlexD10S AlexD10S marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2025 09:45
@AlexD10S AlexD10S requested a review from moliholy September 8, 2025 07:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@moliholy moliholy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Very clean and straightforward PR ✨

@AlexD10S AlexD10S merged commit d63177f into main Sep 8, 2025
35 of 38 checks passed
@AlexD10S AlexD10S deleted the fix/parse-user-input-contracts branch September 8, 2025 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve input None as contract argument Strings are not escpade.

3 participants