Skip to content

Conversation

@erickinnear
Copy link
Contributor

Note also the editorial changes in #3354, which are great and still needed: this adds a little bit more to the reference from those changes to do the key clarifying for #3348.

The remaining clarification about preferred_address is coming in the SPA PRs, but I wanted to look at this paragraph in one place.

Closes #3348.

@ianswett ianswett added -transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. labels Feb 6, 2020
@erickinnear erickinnear force-pushed the ek/cid_during_handshake branch from 4e56751 to 059773c Compare February 10, 2020 07:21
@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit d105908 into quicwg:master Feb 11, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@huitema huitema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Which DCID do Handshake retransmissions use?

8 participants