Skip to content

Conversation

@bdhirsh
Copy link
Contributor

@bdhirsh bdhirsh commented Oct 24, 2022

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/87646

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 Failures

As of commit 874f298:

The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great catch!
Also I guess this means we don't have opinfo (and thus autograd testing) for these ops... We should add them!

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 24, 2022
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.




[ghstack-poisoned]
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.




[ghstack-poisoned]
@bdhirsh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdhirsh commented Oct 24, 2022

we had a few skipped's OpInfo's for as_strided_scatter that I just cleaned up. There are still a few more, but... the OpInfo for as_strided() has some skips as well.

as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.




[ghstack-poisoned]
@bdhirsh bdhirsh added topic: bug fixes topic category module: python frontend For issues relating to PyTorch's Python frontend release notes: python_frontend python frontend release notes category and removed module: python frontend For issues relating to PyTorch's Python frontend labels Oct 27, 2022
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.




cc albanD

[ghstack-poisoned]
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes #88105




cc albanD

[ghstack-poisoned]
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes #88105




cc albanD

[ghstack-poisoned]
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes #88105




cc albanD

[ghstack-poisoned]
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes #88105




cc albanD

[ghstack-poisoned]
@mruberry
Copy link
Collaborator

mruberry commented Nov 2, 2022

If this goes in after https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/85583/files then it should review the skips on the OpInfo

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

huydhn commented Nov 2, 2022

@pytorchbot revert -m 'Sorry for reverting your PR but I think this one or one of the PR in the stack break bionic-cuda11.7 on trunk https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/70782981f06a042796d4604df2ec1491f4f5b194' -c nosignal

@huydhn huydhn reopened this Nov 2, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from albanD November 2, 2022 16:53
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bdhirsh your PR has been successfully reverted.

bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2022
This reverts commit 71fb763.

[ghstack-poisoned]
bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
bdhirsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2022
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes pytorch#88105

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87646
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2022
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
as_strided_scatter's derivative formula was broken - instead of making a "mask" of 1's and 0's, it would effectively make a mask of 1's and uninitialized memory.

Fixes pytorch#88105

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87646
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jan 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 5, 2023
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/bdhirsh/332/head branch June 8, 2023 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request release notes: python_frontend python frontend release notes category Reverted Stale topic: bug fixes topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants