Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 commented May 25, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary:
as a followup to #76496, we defined model specific example_inputs
for the test models in common_quantization.py and used these in test_equalize_fx

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestEqualizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

…ize_fx

Summary:
as a followup to #76496, we defined model specific example_inputs
for the test models in common_quantization.py and used these in test_equalize_fx

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestEqualizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented May 25, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (2 Pending)

As of commit 1ea46cc (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

jerryzh168 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2022
…ize_fx

Summary:
as a followup to #76496, we defined model specific example_inputs
for the test models in common_quantization.py and used these in test_equalize_fx

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestEqualizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 44cabba
Pull Request resolved: #78314
@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 requested review from andrewor14 and vkuzo May 25, 2022 22:57
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @jerryzh168.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2022
…ize_fx (#78314)

Summary:
as a followup to #76496, we defined model specific example_inputs
for the test models in common_quantization.py and used these in test_equalize_fx

Pull Request resolved: #78314

Approved by: https://github.com/vkuzo

Test Plan:
contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/8225f42a8a760259a2adfceb2672c25ef4107037

Test plan from GitHub:
python test/test_quantization.py TestEqualizeFx

Reviewed By: andrewor14, mehtanirav

Differential Revision: D36708225

Pulled By: jerryzh168

fbshipit-source-id: 9fe6227b532576d5ae48536d74e94040ca085ccc
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jerryzh168/795/head branch May 29, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants