-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
More update on the guidance #72818
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More update on the guidance #72818
Conversation
Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/) [ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
|
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 0a639eb (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/) ghstack-source-id: 149109630 Pull Request resolved: #72818
|
|
||
| If the change to the operator is BC-breaking in either the schema or the semantics way, you will need to write an upgrader to make the change non-BC breaking. In general, you can know your operator is BC breaking, if it fails `test/forward_backward_compatibility/check_forward_backward_compatibility.py `. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Some examples BC/FC breaking changes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we even include FC breaking here? maybe not since we don't have any solution for it and it may confuse people more than help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I move the FC breaking example to the note at the end. My intention is to make it easy for users to categorize their change. Let me know if it makes sense
Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #72818 ghstack-source-id: 149315085 Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/)
raziel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes.
It'd be great to find somebody that needs to write an upgrader that goes over these instructions and update as needed.
@cccclai can you please follow up to identify a candidate? Thanks
Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #72818 ghstack-source-id: 149395630 Differential Revision: [D34226823](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34226823/)
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #72818 ghstack-source-id: 149395630 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: raziel Differential Revision: D34226823 fbshipit-source-id: e31b71110e8e94bd9fabe25a388f0d4a9b9d0ca7
|
Hey @cccclai. |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72818 ghstack-source-id: 149395630 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: raziel Differential Revision: D34226823 fbshipit-source-id: e31b71110e8e94bd9fabe25a388f0d4a9b9d0ca7 (cherry picked from commit 57e9b034aabf3efa67ca418e9c6360dc841658b1)
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72818 ghstack-source-id: 149395630 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: raziel Differential Revision: D34226823 fbshipit-source-id: e31b71110e8e94bd9fabe25a388f0d4a9b9d0ca7 (cherry picked from commit 57e9b034aabf3efa67ca418e9c6360dc841658b1)
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72818 ghstack-source-id: 149395630 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: raziel Differential Revision: D34226823 fbshipit-source-id: e31b71110e8e94bd9fabe25a388f0d4a9b9d0ca7 (cherry picked from commit 57e9b034aabf3efa67ca418e9c6360dc841658b1)
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D34226823