Improve assert failure message in test_get_torch_func_signature_exhaustive#67039
Closed
pearu wants to merge 4 commits intogh/pearu/8/basefrom
Closed
Improve assert failure message in test_get_torch_func_signature_exhaustive#67039pearu wants to merge 4 commits intogh/pearu/8/basefrom
pearu wants to merge 4 commits intogh/pearu/8/basefrom
Conversation
…stive [ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 06e2877 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 2 new failures recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
| Job | Step | Action |
|---|---|---|
 linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 / test (docs_test, 1, 1, linux.2xlarge) |
Test | 🔁 rerun |
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).
Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slowFor more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
pearu
added
the
module: tests
Collaborator
|
It is odd that this test appears to be failing on unrelated PRs today and the error message on for those failures is very cryptic -- @jamesr66a or @Chillee do you know what's up? |
…ature_exhaustive" cc mruberry [ghstack-poisoned]
Collaborator
Author
…ature_exhaustive" cc mruberry [ghstack-poisoned]
Collaborator
Author
|
@mruberry The explanation for the failing tests is given here: #67088 (comment) . Basically, |
ngimel
reviewed
Oct 22, 2021
…ature_exhaustive" cc mruberry [ghstack-poisoned]
cpuhrsch
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2021
Contributor
|
@cpuhrsch has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack:
cc @mruberry
Differential Revision: D31899719