Closed
Conversation
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slowFor more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
Contributor
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 93c783a (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 26 new failures recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
82c3921 to
986a71f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/foobar |
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
986a71f to
618b88c
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
d1e5c30 to
1f7273b
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6e663fb to
f0d3e11
Compare
atalman
reviewed
Jan 5, 2022
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are we changing py3.7 workflow instead of adding new 3.10 workflow ?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because there are other python-3.7 cuda enabled configs, aren't they?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes true we do have multiple 3.7 configs
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, for getting rid of this case
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file is not really related to python 3.10. Sould it be included in this PR ?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point, let me update
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun |
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
f0d3e11 to
3d35d45
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun |
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
3 times, most recently
from
41a6fa7 to
02f7bd5
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
02f7bd5 to
d6652f3
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
d6652f3 to
764f6c3
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
764f6c3 to
55c9b74
Compare
malfet
force-pushed
the
malfet/create-python-3.10-ci
branch
from
55324c3 to
93c783a
Compare
Contributor
|
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530 Skip nan hashes comparison validation in `jit/test_hash.py`, as it behaves differently in 3.10 vs other pythons Skip tensor_fx assert tests Skip initializing uint8 tensors from negative values in `TestScript.test_torch_tensor_as_tensor` Final step in closing #66424 Pull Request resolved: #81233 Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
Summary: Second attempt of landing the change after #66530 Skip nan hashes comparison validation in `jit/test_hash.py`, as it behaves differently in 3.10 vs other pythons Skip tensor_fx assert tests Skip initializing uint8 tensors from negative values in `TestScript.test_torch_tensor_as_tensor` Final step in closing #66424 Pull Request resolved: #81233 Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/7ccf693cf6ca28a215d7a79b45cf6f47dfd22029 Reviewed By: DanilBaibak Differential Revision: D37919654 Pulled By: malfet fbshipit-source-id: 20d2cc1258e7411a669d96ad7b423b92f4f8593b
malfet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2022
Second attempt of landing the change after #66530 Skip nan hashes comparison validation in `jit/test_hash.py`, as it behaves differently in 3.10 vs other pythons Skip tensor_fx assert tests Skip initializing uint8 tensors from negative values in `TestScript.test_torch_tensor_as_tensor` Final step in closing #66424 Pull Request resolved: #81233 Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere (cherry picked from commit 7ccf693)
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2023
Needed to be able to install newer Python versions (Python-3.11 in this case), which do not have numerous packages that default environment must have In addition, fix weird incursion of `conda-forge` by torch-deploy test. Reincarnation of an old #66530 Pull Request resolved: #92378 Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First step towards #66424