Skip to content

Conversation

@Freey0
Copy link
Contributor

@Freey0 Freey0 commented May 5, 2021

Stack from ghstack:

Use ghstack to reopen to reduce self conflict。

Differential Revision: D28224599

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented May 5, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 894bbc4 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

1 failure not recognized by patterns:

Job Step Action
GitHub Actions render_test_results Output Test Results (Click Me) 🔁 rerun

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #57587 (894bbc4) into gh/Feey0/1/base (7175d49) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           gh/Feey0/1/base   #57587      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            76.91%   76.91%   -0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                 1968     1968              
  Lines               196385   196385              
===================================================
- Hits                151050   151049       -1     
- Misses               45335    45336       +1     

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented May 5, 2021

@ezyang has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@Freey0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Freey0 commented May 6, 2021

@ezyang , Newbie question, does the failure look irrelevant and do I need to change the base again and wait for the CI to go all green?

Run python tools/render_junit.py .
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch/tools/render_junit.py", line 91, in <module>
    main()
  File "/home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch/tools/render_junit.py", line 86, in main
    testcases = parse_junit_reports(options.report_path)
  File "/home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch/tools/render_junit.py", line 30, in parse_junit_reports
    ret_xml += junitparser.JUnitXml.fromfile(os.path.join(root, file))
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.4/x64/lib/python3.9/site-packages/junitparser/junitparser.py", line 320, in fromfile
    raise JUnitXmlError("Invalid format.")
junitparser.junitparser.JUnitXmlError: Invalid format.
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented May 6, 2021

These are all fine; this was an error on the master you based this set on but it is fixed on master. Don't rebase it will prevent me from landing this set.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang merged this pull request in 3c0d22f.

mrshenli pushed a commit to mrshenli/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 8, 2021
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#57587

Use ghstack to reopen to reduce self conflict。

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: albanD

Differential Revision: D28224599

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 023f21bc976b90f8a5a409db4f3390aa4eaea446
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/Feey0/1/head branch May 10, 2021 14:17
krshrimali pushed a commit to krshrimali/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#57587

Use ghstack to reopen to reduce self conflict。

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: albanD

Differential Revision: D28224599

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 023f21bc976b90f8a5a409db4f3390aa4eaea446
@bdhirsh bdhirsh changed the title Port floor to structured floor: port to structured May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants