-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
Port /test/cpp_extensions/rng_extension.cpp to new operator registration API #39459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 38939c8 Pull Request resolved: #39459
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit ecc8263 (more details on the Dr. CI page): ✅ None of the CI failures appear to be your fault 💚
🚧 1 fixed upstream failure:These were probably caused by upstream breakages that were already fixed.
Please rebase on the
|
|
I see relevant failures in CI? :) |
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 515ef5a Pull Request resolved: #39459
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
|
You've accidentally updated submodules in the diff; take a look at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7718780/how-to-undo-git-submodule-update for how to fix it |
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 076a0c6 Pull Request resolved: #39459
Right, resolved. |
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 784b153 Pull Request resolved: #39459
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: ca1c898 Pull Request resolved: #39459
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 433b76a Pull Request resolved: #39459
|
The binary files are committed by accident and need to be removed |
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: #37010 Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Make it an error to def() an operator multiple times Summary: Previously, if an operator is defined multiple times, it will be merged anyways. This code changes the behavior to spitting error if an operator is defined more than once. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 9e9d686 Pull Request resolved: #39459
|
This pull request has been merged in 47c72be. |
Stack from ghstack:
Summary:
Update to this PR: this code isn't going to fully solve #37010. The changes required for 37010 is more than this PR initially planned. Instead, this PR switches op registration of rng related tests to use the new API (similar to what was done in #36925)
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks: #37010
Tags:
Differential Revision: D22264889