Skip to content

Conversation

@xwang233
Copy link
Collaborator

@xwang233 xwang233 commented May 22, 2020

Follow up of #38044. Thanks @ptrblck, @mcarilli for the help on discussing the changes!

Could fix #37725 by skipping the depthwise-workload check introduced in #22302. This PR also relaxed dilated convolution for channels-last.

The testing script is https://gist.github.com/xwang233/82a707f69bb710cb612349280a2c5f41. About 387k conv arguments were tested and no cudnn exception was thrown.

cc @ngimel @VitalyFedyunin @ptrblck @mcarilli

@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented May 22, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 870b169 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 34 times.

test/test_nn.py Outdated
Comment on lines 11155 to 11158
self.assertEqual(out, ref_out, rtol=0.001, atol=0.001)
self.assertEqual(conv.weight.grad, ref_conv.weight.grad, rtol=0.001, atol=0.001)
self.assertEqual(conv.bias.grad, ref_conv.bias.grad, rtol=0.001, atol=0.001)
self.assertEqual(input.grad, ref_input.grad, rtol=0.001, atol=0.001)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we use the dtype_precisions from here for the check?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Will do!

@ezyang ezyang requested review from VitalyFedyunin and ngimel May 26, 2020 14:32
@ezyang ezyang added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label May 26, 2020
@VitalyFedyunin VitalyFedyunin added this to the 1.5.1 milestone May 28, 2020
@gchanan gchanan modified the milestones: 1.5.1, 1.6.0 Jun 2, 2020
@xwang233
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ngimel @VitalyFedyunin This should be ready for review.

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VitalyFedyunin has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@VitalyFedyunin merged this pull request in 17d3f74.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged open source triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Exception: Operator conv2d lost channels_last property

8 participants