Skip to content

Conversation

@nairbv
Copy link
Collaborator

@nairbv nairbv commented Nov 27, 2019

Stack from ghstack:

Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

Differential Revision: D18765410

Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

[ghstack-poisoned]
nairbv added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2019
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

ghstack-source-id: fffc818
Pull Request resolved: #30527
@nairbv nairbv requested a review from gchanan November 27, 2019 19:10
@nairbv nairbv requested review from albanD and jerryzh168 November 27, 2019 20:53
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

[ghstack-poisoned]
nairbv added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

ghstack-source-id: 4ccb037
Pull Request resolved: #30527
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

Differential Revision: [D18765410](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D18765410)
nairbv added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
Summary:

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at #29511

ghstack-source-id: 3b2d4db
Pull Request resolved: #30527
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/nairbv/15/head branch December 10, 2019 15:20
wuhuikx pushed a commit to wuhuikx/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#30527

When we introduced dtype.is_signed we allowed for support of
quantized types, but we're not sure what the correct result should be.

See discussion at pytorch#29511

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Differential Revision: D18765410

Pulled By: nairbv

fbshipit-source-id: c87cfe999b604cfcbbafa561e04d0d5cdbf41e6d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants