Skip to content

Conversation

@xuhdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@xuhdev xuhdev commented Oct 14, 2019

Instead of an abstruse "unsupported scalarType", we print more.

Instead of an abstruse "unsupported scalarType", we print more.
@xuhdev xuhdev requested a review from nairbv October 14, 2019 21:51
@xuhdev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xuhdev commented Oct 15, 2019

@pytorchbot merge this please

@pytorchbot pytorchbot added the merge-this-please Was marked for merge with @pytorchbot merge this please label Oct 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ezyang is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

zdevito pushed a commit to zdevito/ATen that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2019
Summary:
Instead of an abstruse "unsupported scalarType", we print more.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#27941

Differential Revision: D17933972

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 51e0e1c11e530606612482e24ff28898323e54fc
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang merged this pull request in 5c153de.

thiagocrepaldi pushed a commit to thiagocrepaldi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2020
Summary:
Instead of an abstruse "unsupported scalarType", we print more.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#27941

Differential Revision: D17933972

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 51e0e1c11e530606612482e24ff28898323e54fc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge-this-please Was marked for merge with @pytorchbot merge this please Merged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants