Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 commented Sep 19, 2019

Stack from ghstack:

Summary:
att

Test Plan:
.

Reviewers:
pt1quant

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

This reverts commit b1ecf4b.

Differential Revision: D17491215

…ngine

Summary:
att

Test Plan:
.

Reviewers:
pt1quant

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

This reverts commit b1ecf4b.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchbot pytorchbot added module: internals Related to internal abstractions in c10 and ATen module: operators oncall: quantization Quantization support in PyTorch labels Sep 19, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator

@dzhulgakov dzhulgakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine landing it now if the follow up PR changes it to strings on python side

throw python_error();
}

addQEngine(at::kNoQEngine, "no_qengine", torch_module);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sigh, we should really change it to strings, it's getting really polluting to the namespace

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 8f50ea0.

zdevito pushed a commit to zdevito/ATen that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
…6471)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#26471

att

Test Plan:
.

Imported from OSS

Differential Revision: D17491215

fbshipit-source-id: 5790aa0113bfdbeeb838f3d1530397606ccaa1e9
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jerryzh168/77/head branch October 28, 2019 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: internals Related to internal abstractions in c10 and ATen oncall: quantization Quantization support in PyTorch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants