-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[JIT] Make jit dicts ordered #26465
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
[JIT] Make jit dicts ordered #26465
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot rebase this please |
driazati
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2019
Contributor
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eellison has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
zdevito
pushed a commit
to zdevito/ATen
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2019
Summary:
Makes c10::Dict Ordered and bins binds the OrderedDict() and dict() constructor into torchscript. For the case of the empty constructor dict() i typed it as [str, Tensor] because:
• we're almost dropping support for python 2, at which point all dicts are ordered
• then it's more conventional to write x : Dict[int, int] = {} which is already supported
• It is possible to construct an arbitrarily typed empty OrderedDict through
OrderedDict(torch.jit.annotate(List[Tuple[key, value]], [])
We could consider dropping the no inputs aten::dict constructor since then the types would be more explicit.
This replaces pytorch/pytorch#26170 and pytorch/pytorch#26372 b/c ghstack was poisioned and i had to resubmit
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#26465
Differential Revision: D17481604
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: d2d49795a518c3489881afac45d070e5262c5849
Contributor
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Merged
module: internals
Related to internal abstractions in c10 and ATen
oncall: jit
Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makes c10::Dict Ordered and bins binds the OrderedDict() and dict() constructor into torchscript. For the case of the empty constructor dict() i typed it as [str, Tensor] because:
• we're almost dropping support for python 2, at which point all dicts are ordered
• then it's more conventional to write x : Dict[int, int] = {} which is already supported
• It is possible to construct an arbitrarily typed empty OrderedDict through
OrderedDict(torch.jit.annotate(List[Tuple[key, value]], [])
We could consider dropping the no inputs aten::dict constructor since then the types would be more explicit.
This replaces #26170 and #26372 b/c ghstack was poisioned and i had to resubmit