Skip to content

Conversation

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator

@ngimel ngimel commented Jul 20, 2019

Fixes #22843, also adds test from #23102

@pytorchbot pytorchbot added module: autograd Related to torch.autograd, and the autograd engine in general module: cuda Related to torch.cuda, and CUDA support in general module: operators labels Jul 20, 2019
@ngimel ngimel requested a review from ezyang July 20, 2019 03:51
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@soumith is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@soumith merged this pull request in 4e5f700.

zdevito pushed a commit to zdevito/ATen that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2019
Summary:
Fixes pytorch/pytorch#22843, also adds test from pytorch/pytorch#23102
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#23123

Differential Revision: D16402422

Pulled By: soumith

fbshipit-source-id: aa7a79159ed947be03ce3725ec8abcf5246a60bf
@z-a-f z-a-f mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: autograd Related to torch.autograd, and the autograd engine in general module: cuda Related to torch.cuda, and CUDA support in general open source

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Zero gradients beyond a certain buffer size on CUDA

6 participants