-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
Delete deprecated fp32 precision warnings #166956
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The deprecation warning led to warning spamming in PyTorch APIs, like torch.compile. This is not how a deprecation warning should go: if we add a deprecation warning, we'd better update our built-in APIs to prevent warning spam. [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/166956
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Active SEVsThere are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below: ⏳ 1 Pending, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 4bc1623 with merge base d980d8d ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
albanD
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "idk why td failed" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
|
@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/2.9 --fixes "Remove spammy logs" -c fixnewfeature |
Cherry picking #166956Command Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
The deprecation warning led to warning spamming in PyTorch APIs, like torch.compile. This is not how a deprecation warning should go: if we add a deprecation warning, we'd better update our built-in APIs to prevent warning spam. Pull Request resolved: #166956 Approved by: https://github.com/albanD (cherry picked from commit 527b110)
The deprecation warning led to warning spamming in PyTorch APIs, like torch.compile. This is not how a deprecation warning should go: if we add a deprecation warning, we'd better update our built-in APIs to prevent warning spam. Pull Request resolved: #166956 Approved by: https://github.com/albanD (cherry picked from commit 527b110)
youkaichao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for fixing it!
The deprecation warning led to warning spamming in PyTorch APIs, like torch.compile. This is not how a deprecation warning should go: if we add a deprecation warning, we'd better update our built-in APIs to prevent warning spam. Pull Request resolved: #166956 Approved by: https://github.com/albanD (cherry picked from commit 527b110) Co-authored-by: Richard Zou <[email protected]>
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
The deprecation warning led to warning spamming in PyTorch APIs, like
torch.compile. This is not how a deprecation warning should go: if we
add a deprecation warning, we'd better update our built-in APIs to
prevent warning spam.