[WOQ][Inductor] Enable CUDA coverage for _weight_int8pack_mm #163461
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/163461
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit e449d65 with merge base 9d0d98a ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
pytorch-bot
bot
added
ciflow/inductor
module: inductor
topic: not user facing
Contributor
Contributor
|
@bbeckca It appears that a CUDA implementation of _weight_int8pack_mm exists. Would you be able to provide the associated pull request? Thank you. |
Contributor
Author
Sounds good. Added reference to test plan. |
jerryzh168
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
08d289d to
a0db88f
Compare
Contributor
pytorch-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
a0db88f to
3eac96f
Compare
pytorch-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
Contributor
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
3eac96f to
66de88e
Compare
bbeckca
added a commit
to bbeckca/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
…#163461) Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
Contributor
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
66de88e to
62a7219
Compare
bbeckca
added a commit
to bbeckca/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
…#163461) Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
62a7219 to
562a3b3
Compare
bbeckca
added a commit
to bbeckca/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
…#163461) Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
Contributor
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
562a3b3 to
e834f94
Compare
bbeckca
added a commit
to bbeckca/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
…#163461) Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
Contributor
…#163461) Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D82926440
bbeckca
force-pushed
the
export-D82926440
branch
from
e834f94 to
e449d65
Compare
Contributor
Contributor
|
@pytorchbot merge (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged) |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
jainapurva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2025
Summary: What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py as the kernel was added by #159325. Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered. Test Plan: ``` buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:test_inductor_cuda ``` https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494 Differential Revision: D82926440 Pull Request resolved: #163461 Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
What: Unskip the CUDA path for test_int8_weight_only_quant in test_torchinductor.py as the kernel was added by #159325.
Why: Confirm CUDA backend for _weight_int8pack_mm is registered.
Test Plan:
https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/2533275104869494
Differential Revision: D82926440
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov @coconutruben