This appears to be a diff that was exported from phabricator, but the PR author does not have sufficient permissions to run CI. @DoubleBiao, please do step 2 of internal wiki to get write access so you do not need to get CI approvals in the future. If you think this is a mistake, please contact the Pytorch Dev Infra team.

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/161571

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR
• 📄 Preview C++ docs built from this PR
• ❓ Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit the bot commands wiki

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 01a7053 with merge base 771f369 ():
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D81086607

Attention! native_functions.yaml was changed

If you are adding a new function or defaulted argument to native_functions.yaml, you cannot use it from pre-existing Python frontend code until our FC window passes (two weeks). Split your PR into two PRs, one which adds the new C++ functionality, and one that makes use of it from Python, and land them two weeks apart. See https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch's-Python-Frontend-Backward-and-Forward-Compatibility-Policy#forwards-compatibility-fc for more info.

Caused by:

• aten/src/ATen/native/native_functions.yaml

Didn't find following labels among repository labels: module:mtia, topic:not user facing

Didn't find following labels among repository labels: module:mtia

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@pytorchbot label "module: mtia"

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D81086607

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D81086607

HI @malfet, this is the same diff as
#160372

I just reverted that diff for some reason and then need to land it again. Would you mind helping approve it again?

Thanks
Xiaotian

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D81086607

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra.

@pytorchbot merge -i

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 0 checks:

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team