Skip to content

Conversation

@zklaus
Copy link
Collaborator

@zklaus zklaus commented Jul 8, 2025

This adds the actual creation of a standards compliant sdist along with its upload to s3 to the create release workflow.

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 8, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/157815

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 9d40104 with merge base 3a7db34 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
zklaus added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
@zklaus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zklaus commented Sep 24, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Sep 24, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / linux-jammy-cuda12.8-py3.10-gcc11 / build

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@zklaus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zklaus commented Sep 25, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

jainapurva pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
@rgommers
Copy link
Collaborator

Great to see this re-landed. @zklaus did this make it into the 2.9.0 release? I.e., is pytorch-v2.9.0.tar.gz at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/releases/tag/v2.9.0 a proper sdist?

@zklaus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zklaus commented Oct 17, 2025

Great to see this re-landed. @zklaus did this make it into the 2.9.0 release? I.e., is pytorch-v2.9.0.tar.gz at v2.9.0 (release) a proper sdist?

No, it was delayed until after the branch cut. When the sdist shows up, it will be as torch-v2.10.0.tar.gz.

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/zklaus/18/head branch November 17, 2025 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants