Skip to content

Conversation

@ahmadsharif1
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadsharif1 ahmadsharif1 commented Jun 24, 2025

After I landed this PR: #156600, this test was failing internally on large tensors because the differences were greater than tolerances on some cuda devices.

We now raise the tolerances for larger tensors.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/156699

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit acb0139 with merge base 82eefae (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Jun 24, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadsharif1 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jun 24, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadsharif1 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@ahmadsharif1 ahmadsharif1 requested a review from eqy June 24, 2025 13:35
@ahmadsharif1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eqy feel free to merge it since I am not authorized to do a merge.

@ahmadsharif1 ahmadsharif1 requested a review from ngimel June 25, 2025 13:34
@ahmadsharif1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ngimel or @eqy can one of you merge this?

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadsharif1 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D77225578.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmadsharif1 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D77225578.

@ahmadsharif1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

dnikolaev-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
…#156699)

After I landed this PR: pytorch#156600, this test was failing internally on large tensors because the differences were greater than tolerances on some cuda devices.

We now raise the tolerances for larger tensors.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#156699
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/ngimel

(cherry picked from commit 36dd598)
pruthvistony pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
…nsors (#2583)

After PR: pytorch#156600, this test was
failing internally on large tensors because the differences were greater
than tolerances on some cuda devices.

We now raise the tolerances for larger tensors.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#156699
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/ngimel

(cherry picked from commit 36dd598)

Fixes SWDEV-547998

Co-authored-by: Ahmad Sharif <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants