Skip to content

Conversation

@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor

@masnesral masnesral commented Jan 24, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: I think skipping these tests is suboptimal. If we categorize as expected failures, then we'll see test failures when they start passing, which means they're more likely to be removed. As a skip, they quietly continue to skip.

Summary: I think skipping these tests is suboptimal. If we categorize as expected failures, then we'll see test failures when they start passing, which means they're more likely to be removed. As a skip, they quietly continue to skip.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/145572

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 1 Pending

As of commit 5669f9e with merge base 41b38f7 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Summary: I think skipping these tests is suboptimal. If we categorize as expected failures, then we'll see test failures when they start passing, which means they're more likely to be removed. As a skip, they quietly continue to skip.

ghstack-source-id: f70f5f9
Pull Request resolved: #145572
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Jan 24, 2025
@masnesral masnesral changed the title [BE] mv test/inductor_skips/* to test/inductor_expected_failures/* [BE] mv test/inductor_skips/* to test/inductor_expected_failures/ Jan 24, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 24, 2025 01:43 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 24, 2025 01:43 Inactive
@masnesral masnesral marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 15:45
@masnesral masnesral requested a review from zou3519 January 24, 2025 15:45
@masnesral masnesral added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jan 24, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 24, 2025 16:18 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 24, 2025 16:18 Inactive
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot temporarily deployed to upload-benchmark-results January 24, 2025 16:18 Inactive
@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

nWEIdia pushed a commit to nWEIdia/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
…torch#145572)

Summary: I think skipping these tests is suboptimal. If we categorize as expected failures, then we'll see test failures when they start passing, which means they're more likely to be removed. As a skip, they quietly continue to skip.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#145572
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/zou3519
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/masnesral/171/head branch February 24, 2025 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants