Skip to content

Conversation

@Chillee
Copy link
Collaborator

@Chillee Chillee commented Jan 17, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/145024

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 11 New Failures

As of commit e46c096 with merge base 17a6d4b (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Chillee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 868b4ef
Pull Request resolved: #145024
Chillee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
ghstack-source-id: a959662
Pull Request resolved: #145024
Chillee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 7ef7ddd
Pull Request resolved: #145024
Copy link
Contributor

@eellison eellison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think we can just opt in torch/_functorch/partitioners to the OrderedSet linter as well..

masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
Copied from #145024, but made _all_ sets OrderedSets and fixed mypy complaints. Note that this change does not fix the non-determinism we're seeing in the internal model. But let's at least eliminate this potential source of non-determinism before investigating any changes to the mincut approach?

[ghstack-poisoned]
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 29, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 29, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/chillee/377/head branch June 29, 2025 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants