Skip to content

Conversation

@AishwaryaSivaraman
Copy link
Contributor

@AishwaryaSivaraman AishwaryaSivaraman commented Jan 14, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

This appears to be a diff that was exported from phabricator, but the PR author does not have sufficient permissions to run CI. @AishwaryaSivaraman, please do step 2 of internal wiki to get write access so you do not need to get CI approvals in the future. If you think this is a mistake, please contact the Pytorch Dev Infra team.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 14, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: AishwaryaSivaraman / name: Aishwarya Sivaraman (f116eda)

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/144773

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 8 New Failures, 15 Unrelated Failures

As of commit f116eda with merge base ec1c3ab (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68155591

@jamesjwu jamesjwu added topic: not user facing topic category ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Jan 14, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#144773

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D68155591
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68155591

jamesjwu
jamesjwu previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't merge closed PR #144773

@izaitsevfb izaitsevfb reopened this Jan 23, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot dismissed jamesjwu’s stale review January 23, 2025 01:00

This PR was reopened (likely due to being reverted), so your approval was removed. Please request another review.

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

This PR needs to be approved by an authorized maintainer before merge.

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: Meta Internal-Only Changes Check

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@izaitsevfb
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants