Skip to content

Conversation

@isuruf
Copy link
Collaborator

@isuruf isuruf commented Nov 14, 2024

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/140756

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit aa9ebe7 with merge base f5e6e52 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 561b574
Pull Request resolved: #140756
[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 2d2669a
Pull Request resolved: #140756
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
ghstack-source-id: fac4424
Pull Request resolved: #140756
[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 9c007f7
Pull Request resolved: #140756
[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 8c2c4ce
Pull Request resolved: #140756
@isuruf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isuruf commented Jun 24, 2025

@pytorchbot rebase -b main

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/main. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebase failed due to Command git -C /home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch rebase refs/remotes/origin/main gh/isuruf/105/orig returned non-zero exit code 1

warning: skipped previously applied commit 235bdd50675
warning: skipped previously applied commit e1cd32f85c0
hint: use --reapply-cherry-picks to include skipped commits
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.skippedCherryPicks false"
Rebasing (1/1)
Auto-merging torch/_dynamo/config.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in torch/_dynamo/config.py
error: could not apply 5cbcd49d70d... Enable C++ dynamic shape guards by default
hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with
hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Could not apply 5cbcd49d70d... Enable C++ dynamic shape guards by default

Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/15841087008

[ghstack-poisoned]
isuruf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
ghstack-source-id: b7bb5f1
Pull Request resolved: #140756
@isuruf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isuruf commented Jun 24, 2025

@pytorchbot rebase -b viable/strict

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 0f46990
Pull Request resolved: #140756
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully rebased gh/isuruf/105/orig onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via ghstack checkout https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140756)

@isuruf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isuruf commented Jun 24, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

zou3519 commented Oct 28, 2025

The performance impact of this seems significant (see vllm-project/vllm#26320). I did notice this was turned off in fbcode by default, and that's not a good sign. Can we consider either (1) working towards aligning the fbcode and non-fbcode defaults and/or (2) benchmarking this even more to get data?

@anijain2305 @laithsakka.

@isuruf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isuruf commented Oct 28, 2025

This was turned off in fbcode because of issues with compiling sources on the fly internally AFAIK. @ezyang and @anijain2305 might be able to shed some light on that.

Yes, if there are lots of recompiles, this might have a negative performance impact. On the other hand, this PR makes the runtime faster if the compilation time is ignored. Let's discuss in the linked issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants