Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Nov 14, 2024

This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/140720

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 2 Active SEVs

There are 2 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit 15edd3c with merge base 891ba2e (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Pull Request resolved: #140720

This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.
ghstack-source-id: 253592160
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)
This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Pull Request resolved: #140720

This was added in pytorch/executorch#1789 . I'm working on sharing Half.h with ExecuTorch, and this is a missing feature.
ghstack-source-id: 253813016
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D65949409](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65949409/)
@swolchok swolchok added release notes: performance_as_product release notes: cpp release notes category and removed release notes: cpp release notes category labels Nov 15, 2024
@swolchok swolchok requested a review from malfet November 15, 2024 22:01
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this one is not ready for land yet; surprised checks pass because I think I'm seeing a failure internally. need to investigate

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 18, 2024
#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(_M_X64) || defined(__i386) || \
defined(_M_IX86)
#if defined(__F16C__)
#define X86_F16 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be something like _HAS_X86_64_F16 (to avoid even a slight possibility of name collision)

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Nov 18, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65949409

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Ryo-not-rio pushed a commit to Ryo-not-rio/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
pobin6 pushed a commit to pobin6/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants