Skip to content

Conversation

@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan commented Nov 13, 2024

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/140542

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 2626d83 with merge base 2903cf0 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from albanD as a code owner November 13, 2024 15:05
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
@guangyey
Copy link
Collaborator

Good to me, it needs Alban's final stamp.

[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@albanD could you take a look at this?

Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both names seemed used so no strong opinion here. I guess these are new enough that we can change them.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from albanD December 10, 2024 07:51
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM !

@guangyey
Copy link
Collaborator

@XuehaiPan Could you help clean up {idx => index} in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_accelerator.py

[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 11, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

huydhn commented Dec 11, 2024

@pytorchbot revert -m 'Sorry for reverting your change, but I need to revert this in order to revert #133572 (comment) due to a conflict' -c weird

Please help rebase and reland this

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@XuehaiPan your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…dx => index}` (#140542)"

This reverts commit fb02b40.

Reverted #140542 on behalf of https://github.com/huydhn due to Sorry for reverting your change, but I need to revert this in order to revert #133572 (comment) due to a conflict ([comment](#140542 (comment)))
@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot added Reverted ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR labels Dec 11, 2024
[ghstack-poisoned]
XuehaiPan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@guangyey
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD Do you think if this PR should cherry pick to release/2.6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants