Skip to content

Conversation

@etaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@etaf etaf commented Nov 11, 2024

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 11, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/140269

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit c37ff96 with merge base f84e533 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
etaf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 76f316a
Pull Request resolved: #140269
@etaf etaf added the ciflow/xpu Run XPU CI tasks label Nov 12, 2024
[ghstack-poisoned]
etaf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
ghstack-source-id: fbf029c
Pull Request resolved: #140269
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@etaf etaf marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 08:38
@etaf etaf requested a review from desertfire November 14, 2024 08:41
@clee2000
Copy link
Contributor

clee2000 commented Dec 9, 2024

@pytorchbot revert -m "breaks forward compatibility? D66937097" -c ghfirst

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!! Forward compatibility breakage detected !!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

These symbols are declared in model so, but not in fbpkg:
aoti_torch_device_type_xpu

@desertfire Could you help take a look at this?

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@etaf your PR has been successfully reverted.

@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot added Reverted ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR labels Dec 9, 2024
This PR add XPU support for AOT Inductor, and reuse the corresponding UT.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
…e load for Intel GPU."

Stack from [ghstack](https://github.com/ezyang/ghstack) (oldest at bottom):

* #140686
* __->__ #140664
* #140269
* #140268
* #135320
* #135318
* #139026 


Fix #140546



cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
… GPU."

Stack from [ghstack](https://github.com/ezyang/ghstack) (oldest at bottom):

* #140686
* __->__ #140664
* #140269
* #140268
* #135320
* #135318
* #139026 


Fix #140546



cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor

These symbols are declared in model so, but not in fbpkg:
aoti_torch_device_type_xpu


@desertfire Could you help take a look at this?

I added a missing #ifdef USE_XPU in aoti_runtime/model.h, and tested it passes in fbcode.

This PR add XPU support for AOT Inductor, and reuse the corresponding UT.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
…e load for Intel GPU."

Stack from [ghstack](https://github.com/ezyang/ghstack) (oldest at bottom):

* #140686
* __->__ #140664
* #140269
* #140268
* #135320
* #135318
* #139026 


Fix #140546



cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
… GPU."

Stack from [ghstack](https://github.com/ezyang/ghstack) (oldest at bottom):

* #140686
* __->__ #140664
* #140269
* #140268
* #135320
* #135318
* #139026 


Fix #140546



cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang aakhundov

[ghstack-poisoned]
@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Dec 9, 2024

Also, this test is breaking Mac testing, although results were initially occluded by #142206

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor

Also, this test is breaking Mac testing, although results were initially occluded by #142206

Do you have a test failure link? I wonder what the problem is.

@etaf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

etaf commented Dec 10, 2024

Also, this test is breaking Mac testing, although results were initially occluded by #142206

Do you have a test failure link? I wonder what the problem is.

Seems not relate to this PR: #142436

@etaf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

etaf commented Dec 10, 2024

The failed job :xpu / linux-jammy-xpu-2025.0-py3.9 / test (default, 4, 4, linux.idc.xpu) (gh)
inductor/test_torchinductor_opinfo.py::TestInductorOpInfoXPU::test_comprehensive_masked_cumprod_xpu_float16

is a known issue #141861 and has been fixed in main branch by #142348.

Please ignore it.

mori360 pushed a commit to mori360/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
bluenote10 pushed a commit to bluenote10/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
bluenote10 pushed a commit to bluenote10/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
bluenote10 pushed a commit to bluenote10/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
Esquains pushed a commit to Esquains/study1 that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/etaf/60/head branch January 11, 2025 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants