Skip to content

Conversation

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 11, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/140251

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit eb55040 with merge base f4ce9ac (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
@anijain2305 anijain2305 added release notes: dynamo ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@williamwen42 williamwen42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we expect the string stance to be "default" when skip_guard_eval_unsafe=True?

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we expect the string stance to be "default" when skip_guard_eval_unsafe=True?

It can be other stances as well. But I expect default to be the most common.


def __init__(self, stance: str, force_backend=None) -> None:
def __init__(
self, stance: str, skip_guard_eval_unsafe: bool = False, force_backend=None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's force these to be kwargs:

Suggested change
self, stance: str, skip_guard_eval_unsafe: bool = False, force_backend=None
self, stance: str, *, skip_guard_eval_unsafe: bool = False, force_backend=None



def set_stance(stance: str, force_backend=None):
def set_stance(stance: str, skip_guard_eval_unsafe=False, force_backend=None):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
def set_stance(stance: str, skip_guard_eval_unsafe=False, force_backend=None):
def set_stance(stance: str, *, skip_guard_eval_unsafe=False, force_backend=None):

Comment on lines 161 to 163
void* diff_guard_root_mgr =
torch::dynamo::convert_to_root_guard_manager(
cache_entry.guard_manager.attr("diff_guard_root"));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How expensive is this? Could we do this without doing a Python getattr (with refcountin, etc)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed this. And added a new member to the cache_entry, which we update in lockstep with the python diff_guard_root update.

@jansel
Copy link
Contributor

jansel commented Nov 20, 2024

Maybe we should also give stance="default" default arg, so people can choose to only set skip_guard_eval_unsafe/force_backend

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
@anijain2305 anijain2305 requested a review from jansel November 20, 2024 22:12
@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants