[AOTI] Forward fix #139458 #139485
[AOTI] Forward fix #139458 #139485
Conversation
Summary: A new test added in #139153 only fails in certain CI instance. Skip for now as the failing test has a low priority.
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/139485
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 5078d5b with merge base 33dce10 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
desertfire
changed the title
|
@desertfire has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
1 similar comment
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "forward fix" |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
15 similar comments
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
1 similar comment
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 0 checks: Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'To fix trunk' |
|
The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
8 similar comments
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally) |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'To fix trunk' |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Summary: A new test added in pytorch#139458 only fails in certain CI instance. Skip for now as the failing test has a low priority. @diff-train-skip-merge (to silent fb bot so that I can land this myself) Pull Request resolved: pytorch#139485 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/hl475
Summary: A new test added in #139458 only fails in certain CI instance. Skip for now as the failing test has a low priority.
@diff-train-skip-merge (to silent fb bot so that I can land this myself)
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov