Skip to content

Conversation

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor

@desertfire desertfire commented Nov 1, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: Reland #139224. clone_preserve_strides implemented in _inductor/utils.py does not handle multi-dimensional 0-size tensor correctly.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov

Differential Revision: D65317451

Summary: Reland #139224. clone_preserve_strides implemented in _inductor/utils.py does not handle multi-dimensional 0-size tensor correctly.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 1, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/139458

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dcd3eb4 with merge base c8a648d (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
Summary: Reland #139224. clone_preserve_strides implemented in _inductor/utils.py does not handle multi-dimensional 0-size tensor correctly.

ghstack-source-id: a27754e
Pull Request resolved: #139458
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@desertfire has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 1, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@huydhn , I am seeing a test failure gain, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11630431539/job/32390170943, but I don't understand why there was no test failure at the merge time. Also I can't reproduce the problem locally.

I will push a test skip as forward fix, since AOTI's arrayref mode has a low priority now.

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

huydhn commented Nov 1, 2024

Ugh, I know why now. It's a miss in target determination. In your PR, I see it wrongly put inductor/test_aot_inductor_arrayref in the excluded list https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11623531200/job/32371167542#step:22:595

Atm, we have a the mechanism to add ci-no-td label to a reverted PR to avoid this, so you see that the failure shows up on your original PR #139224. The tool doesn't know that this reland PR is the same, let me create an issue to get this fix.

cc @clee2000

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
Summary: A new test added in #139458 only fails in certain CI instance. Skip for now as the failing test has a low priority.

@diff-train-skip-merge (to silent fb bot so that I can land this myself)

Pull Request resolved: #139485
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/hl475
rahulsingh-intel pushed a commit to rahulsingh-intel/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
rahulsingh-intel pushed a commit to rahulsingh-intel/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary: A new test added in pytorch#139458 only fails in certain CI instance. Skip for now as the failing test has a low priority.

@diff-train-skip-merge (to silent fb bot so that I can land this myself)

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#139485
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/hl475
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/desertfire/499/head branch December 2, 2024 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants